Seanad debates

Wednesday, 22 June 2011

11:00 am

Photo of Maurice CumminsMaurice Cummins (Fine Gael)

It is a fact that 75% of defined benefit pension schemes are going to be in deficit. The Minister for Social Protection is due to come before the House tomorrow to take the debate on the Social Welfare and Pensions Bill and perhaps she might comment on some of the points made by Senator Darragh O'Brien in respect of that matter.

I dealt previously with the recommendations relating to the Magdalene homes, particularly in the context of the interdepartmental committee that has been established. I agreed that the House would engage in a debate on the recommendations when the committee submits its report.

Senator Zappone referred to the UN Human Rights Council's report and matters relating to sexual orientation and stated that we are in breach of human rights laws. In that context, she asked for an update in respect of the advisory group. I will try to ascertain from the relevant Minister the up-to-date position regarding that matter and I will contact the Senator as soon as I receive a reply.

Senator Norris inquired about Private Members' business, the time slot for which has been changed to 4.30 p.m. to 6.30 p.m. The Senator was correct to state that the House has not dealt with much legislation this week. However, we are due to take Second Stage of the Social Welfare and Pensions Bill tomorrow and the Committee and Report Stages of this legislation will be taken next week. In addition, the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) Bill is also due to be taken next week. The House will, therefore, deal almost exclusively with legislation next week.

Senator Healy Eames referred to the report on early school learning and the patronage of schools. The forum on patronage and pluralism in the primary school is beginning its work today. I am sure the Minister for Education and Skills will be willing to come before the House to discuss those matters when the forum issues its report.

Senator White referred to Seanad reform. I am glad the debate on such reform and on the abolition of the House has already begun. Were he alive, I do not know how John Boyle O'Reilly would vote on the matter. There is no doubt that, over the coming 12 months or so, the debate on this issue will be extremely lively.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.