Caít Keane (Fine Gael)

Yes, it is. There would be a significant environmental benefit to the State in not having to treat as much water. That has been shown by a cost-benefit analysis and it has also been shown that there would be a carbon-saving element also. I refer to electricity, chlorination and other water treatments with which we are polluting the environment. We pay a great deal of money for that and savings could be made in that regard. The Government spends €1 billion on water treatment facilities and has plans to invest a further €1.5 billion on upgrading the water supply infrastructure.

An important part of the motion refers to leakage. I disagree with the motion but accept that leakage occurs. Statistics based on research carried out by South Dublin County Council indicate that the current average daily water consumption per person in this country is more than 148 litres. That is mad. We must educate people to reduce water consumption. Education is required on water harvesting and minimisation of use in addition to water treatment and leak reduction. It is not an either-or situation, that we must have one without the other. The Minister has said both approaches will be used in tandem - minimisation, treatment of leaks and charges. The statistics indicate that the highest percentage of leaks in a county is 58% and the lowest rate is 16%. I am proud to say South Dublin County Council is the lowest. I was reminded by the Dublin city manager recently that the pipe infrastructure in South Dublin is much newer than in Dublin city or other counties. All those points must be taken into consideration.

Every other country in the European Union has a water charge. Why should we be the exception to the rule in the Union? We must educate people. As a member of the European Union we must comply with its regulations. We do not wish to leave ourselves open to fines. I could say much more on the issue. I commend those who tabled the motion for discussion.