Seanad debates

Wednesday, 1 June 2011

Smithwick Tribunal of Inquiry: Motion

 

4:00 pm

Photo of Rónán MullenRónán Mullen (Independent)

I welcome the Minister to the House and I welcome the opportunity to comment on the motion.

The public have an underlying expectation that, at a time of tremendous pressure on resources, we do what we can to minimise unnecessary expense, particularly on tribunals. For that reason, I am concerned that the Smithwick tribunal might be the innocent victim of the notoriety generated by the lengthy activities of another tribunal. It is important to respond to public concerns and acknowledge that this tribunal has been going on for six years at a cost of €8 million. That is clear.

However, I stress the importance of what we are doing with regard to this tribunal. There is a background here. It is the relationship between Ireland and Great Britain, and particularly the question of responsibility. We are seeking the greatest possible measure of co-operation from our British counterparts with regard to the Dublin and Monaghan bombings. It is important, not least for that reason, that we not be seen to skimp on the investigation into this notorious killing of two senior RUC officers in 1989. That was a date which will live in infamy, to borrow a phrase made famous elsewhere.

Another issue arises. It is the importance of maximum consultation with the Oireachtas. I spoke earlier today about the need for the Government to avoid rushing off to hold press conferences prior to bringing matters before the Oireachtas. I find myself sympathetic to the proposal of my colleagues on the Fianna Fáil side that a report should first be submitted to the Oireachtas justifying the Government's proposed move.

It is a matter of trying to cut down on unnecessary expense. That is a big issue at present. We must also have regard to the specific importance of this tribunal. I accept that the Minister says he does not see himself as cutting short the work of the tribunal. I also accept that it will be possible for the chairman of the tribunal to seek an extension of time. That said, I see the Minister's proposal as a sudden foreshortening. There should first be a report to the Oireachtas justifying the move the Government proposes to make rather than a relatively short debate in both Houses of the Oireachtas today followed by a whipped vote. For that reason I support the Opposition amendment.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.