Seanad debates

Wednesday, 1 December 2010

Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Bill 2008: Committee Stage (Resumed).

 

1:00 pm

Photo of David NorrisDavid Norris (Independent)

Yes, I believe I have made the point. The language is clear. Protection is not afforded to people who make allegations which they know to be misleading, vexatious or frivolous for corrupt reasons. The import of Senator Mullen's amendments would be to open a blackmailer's charter. If Transparency International stands over the amendments tabled by the Senator, it has made a mistake. I am certain the Senator has tabled the amendments in good faith. However, I do not understand the logic behind them and he certainly has not persuaded me by his arguments.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.