Jim Walsh (Fianna Fail)

I am not happy with the Minister's response and there is no point in saying otherwise. On Second Stage I mentioned issues which motivated us in these amendments. On marriage breakdown, divorce and cohabitation, the graph is moving upwards. There is both a social and an economic cost, about which every Member of the House should have concerns. The amendment would not advance the issue to any great extent, but it is essential that we send a message to society that marriage is the institution on which the fabric of society is soundly based. I make no apology for saying this because of the child-centred nature of marriage. I have already conceded that if this was not the case, marriage would be the same as all other relationships, particularly those of a sexual nature. In this instance we must ensure the message is sent loud and clear. The Minister and Members such as Senators Buttimer and Bacik should know the amendment would not have any consequences for the rights being granted in the Bill to civil partnerships.

Senator Norris made some critical comments about Senator Quinn. There is no more measured or considerate person in this House than Senator Quinn.