Jim Walsh (Fianna Fail)

I do not. I mean that the natural order where children emerge focuses my mind. In the overwhelming majority of cases that will be through the institution of heterosexual relationships, specifically marriage.

I was very taken by and wish to acknowledge that I was reassured by the Minister's response to us on the last amendment, tabled by Senator Norris. We touched on this issue and on adoption although I recognise the Senator's current amendments are probably more relevant to the topic of guardianship. I was reassured because it was obvious from the Minister's comments that very careful consideration had been given to these issues by him, his officials and the Government. Knowing the Minister as a good family man and knowing the value he would place on children, it does not surprise me that such is the case. He pointed out that it is a comprehensive and complex area.and we need to be extremely balanced. Many interests are involved, including, as Senator Norris rightly said, biological fathers in instances where they have no say in the rearing of their biological children. It is an enormous area and I agree with the Senator. John Waters has been a champion in this area for many years, often a lone voice. That should be considered.

I heard Senator Regan ask the Minister if he had confidence in the Law Reform Commission. Like the good lawyer he is, the Senator knew the answer before he asked the question. The Minister would not be in a position in the House to say other than what he said.