Seanad debates

Wednesday, 7 July 2010

Civil Partnership and Certain Rights and Obligations of Cohabitants Bill 2009: Committee Stage

 

6:00 pm

Photo of Eugene ReganEugene Regan (Fine Gael)

I do not support the amendment because it is unnecessary. The Title to the Bill was changed in the Lower House and is perfectly clear in its intent. On the general issue of the distinction to be made between the family and non-marital relationships, which is the purpose of the amendment, there is no confusion. The Bill does not involve a change to the Constitution. It is designed to provide rights and dignity to people involved in relationships which are different in form from marriage. There is no lack of clarity in the Bill and, in such circumstances, I cannot support the amendment.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.