Labhrás Ó Murchú (Fianna Fail)

I will also deal with that in a moment. The record needs to be correct on all these issues. I must also make it clear that my expressing views that may be contrary to Government policy has nothing to do with the leadership of Fianna Fáil. I admire Deputy Brian Cowen. He has shown exceptional strength of character. He has demonstrated integrity and patriotic leadership.

It is important to put all these points on the record because I find much confusion in a debate of this kind. Members of this House should be allowed to express their views without fear or favour. Some Senators who support this legislation have been to the fore in that regard, and long may that continue.

Anyone who takes the time to study the record of the House will find a comprehensive statement by me regarding same-sex union and civil partnership. I felt it was important to lay out my stall on that occasion when there was an opportunity for each Member of the House to put his or her views on the record before the heat of battle. I did that. I believe Senator Norris complimented me at the time. I mention that occasion because I want to get the question of my attitude to same-sex unions out of the way and deal with specific issues in this regard.

In so far as my name was invoked, I ask Senator Norris to check the record. I said that since I came into the House I have upheld the rights of prisoners of conscience in Ireland and abroad. I never missed an opportunity to do that wherever I felt it was necessary. I followed that by saying it was possible, in the future, that I would have to speak for Irish prisoners of conscience who were imprisoned on foot of legislation in which I had acquiesced. There is a penalty clause for anyone who wishes to exercise his or her conscience. The penalty is six months in prison. I do not think that is necessary or right. It does not do anything for the Bill and I am surprised that even those who fully favour the extension of the Bill would want to see that happening in this country.

I took grave exception to the fact that when we were endeavouring to create a debate so that people would know precisely what is in the legislation, that debate was being stifled. For example, when the Catholic bishops issued a statement, they were told they should not interfere.