Ivana Bacik (Independent)

It again emphasises the need for further debate on Seanad reform. Any such debate must consider both the structures of the Seanad but also the manner in which Members organise their business. I note that the former Minister, Michael McDowell, has stated publicly that he has moved from being an abolitionist with regard to the Seanad to being pro-reform of the House. Members must consider the means of reform and how best to order their business in order that they deal with more legislation. All Members would welcome this and would welcome having more time to deal with legislation in an orderly fashion. Certainly, today's Order of Business strikes me as being unduly rushed in respect of dealing with the Health (Amendment) (No. 2) Bill and the Wildlife (Amendment) Bill.

I seek a debate on crime and on prisons in light of the horrific shootings in Dublin on Monday last. While Members have debated legislation on organised crime in the recent past, a broader debate is required on how to deal with crime in a rational fashion, that is, in a manner that addresses the difficulties in prosecuting and investigating organised crime, rather than with the knee-jerk reaction of some commentators who have argued for the throwing out of the jury system, greater use of special courts and so on. I note the Director of Public Prosecutions has not referred organised crime cases to the Special Criminal Court and perhaps Members should consider more supports for juries and better ways of dealing with crime. In addition, prisons should be examined because it is clear that a massive overcrowding problem exists therein. Far too many people are being sent to prison for short sentences for non-violent offences and groups such as the Irish Penal Reform Trust have offered some highly constructive ways of diverting offenders in order that jails can be freed up and used for those who are engaged in the most serious crimes, in violent crime and in organised crime.