Seanad debates

Tuesday, 29 June 2010

3:00 am

Photo of Rónán MullenRónán Mullen (Independent)

It is customary for Members to address points to the Leader or the Cathaoirleach at this point in the proceedings. I would be grateful, however, if the Leader or Green Party Senators for whom I have the highest regard conveyed to the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Deputy Gormley, that many have expressed disquiet at his comments on the rights of church leaders to comment on legislation. I refer, in particular, to the Civil Partnership Bill, on which he said something to the effect that he thought the era of church interference had come to an end. Archbishop Martin spoke with his usual clarity when he observed that only one year ago some politicians had been giving out about church leaders for not being vocal enough in making their position on the Lisbon treaty known. I was disappointed at the Minister's comments and believe they reflect a failure to understand the views of all groups within civic society must be welcomed. As a Minister, he should welcome the participation of all groups in the debate. Since I have no doubt he would not object to church pronouncements in support of environmental protection, I can only conclude it was a cheap shot given the perceived weakness of the church at the moment. I regret it. It would be greatly to his credit if he took an opportunity to withdraw the comment, having reflected on it.

The bishops are correct in calling for a free vote on this issue, particularly as it has to do with delicate issues of conscience.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.