Seanad debates

Thursday, 17 June 2010

11:00 am

Photo of Feargal QuinnFeargal Quinn (Independent)

Professor Honohan is unsure whether we need a commission of investigation to examine what happened in the past. We should ask him to propose legislation that we could debate, as I am concerned that a talking shop will develop. In some talking shopsh people can go on and on about what happened in the past. Let us talk about what is to happen in the future. In that regard, we should consider the figures we received from Anglo Irish Bank yesterday. It was an interesting debate and re-reading it would be worthwhile. Anglo Irish Bank told us that there were five choices which carried a heavy cost. The bank has come to the conclusion that it would be best to create a good bank and a bad bank. If we were to do this, we would have some chance of getting out. The bank's delegates have thought the matter through and want to move in that direction. I am unsure whether they are right, but the matter would benefit from a Seanad debate on it. As a reminder to the House, when one member of the bank's delegation was asked how much this action would cost, he stated it would be marginal. When pushed, he stated the cost would run to several hundred million euro. The word "marginal" gives us some idea of what we are discussing. We should be debating the issue in the House on a regular basis.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.