Seanad debates

Wednesday, 16 June 2010

Dog Breeding Establishments Bill 2009: Report and Final Stages

 

3:00 pm

Photo of Mark DeareyMark Dearey (Green Party)

The principle of being self-financed stands other sectors in good stead. In the sector in which I work, I must contribute to my own regulation. That is the way it is across the board and the costs are not excessive. This measure will improve the overall standing of the industry in the eyes of the public and of the market abroad, where the Irish puppy breeding industry does not enjoy a good reputation. On the contrary, I have seen some highly distressing articles that do Ireland's good name and the quality of our exploits generally no good whatsoever. Consequently, I believe the regulation is proportionate. I acknowledge it will impose a certain level of costs and incidentally, the person who lobbied me did so on a competitiveness, rather than on a welfare issue. However, gains that will outweigh such relatively low costs will come through and the sector will enjoy a better guaranteed Irish branding. This will improve the ability of the greyhound sector and the puppy industry in general to find new markets. Those who purchase from this sector will be able to do so with the confidence that animal welfare and regulation in general are being upheld to the highest standards in Ireland.

I urge Members to desist from hyperbole and bogus arguments and to stick to the facts. The greyhound sector must be part of an overall Dog Breeding Establishments Bill as to leave it out would be ludicrous and would lead to a gradual erosion of its integrity over time. I entirely support the proposals and commend the Minister on the amendments he has accepted. He has taken on board the views of this House and Members ought to recognise that.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.