Mark Dearey (Green Party)

It is a debate we should have but not in terms of maximising the value of a sporting event. I agree with Senator Norris as it would be disruptive to a day I enjoy as quiet and meditative. That is my choice. I am of the view that the event in question will impinge on that choice. It is worth engaging in a debate on this matter. However, it is most unfortunate that it will take place in the context of a sporting event. As a vintner, I understand the pressure on people to meet targets and make their businesses work.

I support most, if not all, of what Senator MacSharry said in respect of retailing. There is a need for a review of the burden local government financing places on the business sector. I am of the view that this burden must be spread. The relevant Minister is giving active consideration to this matter, in the context of the various options that ought to be available, and should be supported in that regard. The current system is unsustainable. That system has led to appalling planning decisions being made, particularly as development levies have driven decisions to grant permissions. The consequences of the latter can be seen in the context of the massive amounts of retail space that is available but unused on the boundaries of our towns.

I encourage landlords to shoulder some of the burden by examining the possibility of accepting turnover-related rents. Landlords could join retailers in risk-sharing and encourage the revival of town centres simply by entering into new arrangements based on turnover-related rents. I appeal to them to give consideration to this proposal. The other alternative is that they will obtain absolutely nothing from the system under which they currently operate.