Seanad debates

Tuesday, 9 March 2010

Dog Breeding Establishments Bill 2009: Committee Stage (Resumed)

 

1:00 am

Photo of Paul BradfordPaul Bradford (Fine Gael)

I listened with interest to the debate and read with interest the Minister's proposals and a lighter thought struck me. Our former colleague - I do not believe we can name people - who left the employment of this House and her political party some weeks ago because she felt her party leader was not providing for her proper employment prospects, would be a possible contender to be deemed an authorised officer under this section.

If we had dealt with section 17 in advance of section 16 and if we had deliberated on the powers of the authorised officer, which are very substantial and far-reaching, we would have tread very carefully when we debated who could take up those positions as authorised persons. As we said on Second Stage, the designated authorised persons will have significant responsibilities, significant discretion and significant decision-making entitlements. That is why it is important we are happy with the people who will hold the title "authorised person".

I agree with a previous speaker in regard to the thinking behind the Fine Gael amendment. Since we began discussing the legislation some weeks ago, the main concern expressed by this side of the House and by speakers on the other side of it is that while there is something very laudable about the backdrop to the legislation and while we all support the necessity to regulate and, if necessary, shut down puppy farms, there is a fear that somehow written into the Bill are sections which could impact negatively on some of our traditional country pursuits and county sports, in particular. We must, therefore, try to be a little bit cautious in how the legislation is written.

There is a possibility of a coach and four being used in regard to the appointment of authorised officers. Not only can the local authorities appoint authorised officers but as we see with section 15(2), they can allow other organisations to appoint them. Authorised officers will not only be appointed by the local authority. The local authority can enter into an agreement with other organisations which can appoint authorised officers.

On the basis that we are talking about a position which has great responsibility and great powers, it is crucial that Members of this House and all those affected by the legislation, in particular those who must work within the rules and regulations laid down, are content and comfortable with those appointed as authorised officers. The Fine Gael amendment prescribes that veterinary practitioners only be allowed to carry out these duties.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.