Paschal Donohoe (Fine Gael)

I thank the Minister for confirming my understanding of the matter and I take his point in that regard. However, while I understand the case he has made I believe the Bill is flawed in this regard.

The Minister has far more experience of this area than do I in terms of what happened in Mayo and the controversy in that regard. Let us consider the position had this system been in place when those difficulties arose and since then in regard to the application. People outside the system who have a strong interest in the outcome of a project and who do not have an opportunity to understand or have an input into the case being made by the different parties will make the point that the process is secretive and non-transparent. I referred earlier to the planning process which while complicated allows public access at clear stages. Regardless of how big or complicated the planning application there is a point at which requests for further information are made, the reasons for which are clearly outlined and the information with which the developer responds is clearly outlined. This type of approach is used in respect of huge planning applications.

I believe we should try to find a mid-point in this process at which the public could have an opportunity to state its view in terms of what is happening and to make input if they so wish. Otherwise, I fear this body which is meant to improve confidence could at some point be charged with being secretive because the public is not permitted to see the valuation and submissions being made in the process. While Fine Gael supports the Bill and welcomes the improvements made, it is vital we improve not alone transparency at the end of the process but at some mid-point of it so people can understand what is happening and have an opportunity to make an input if they so wish.