Seanad debates

Wednesday, 21 October 2009

2:30 pm

Photo of Marc MacSharryMarc MacSharry (Fianna Fail)

As we sit here and contemplate the future of the House, 90% of members of the largest public sector union - IMPACT - have voted for industrial action if public sector pay is cut. In these days and weeks, that issue is much more important than this debate, which has been held previously and can be held again. The pressing preparations for the most severe budget ever are under way. As the social partners meet in Government Buildings, I want to impress upon them the essential nature of agreement. That 86% of people voted to take industrial action in the context of some of the measures that must be taken in the forthcoming budget should exercise these benches to be full and our voices to be the loudest.

I would welcome any imminent and worthwhile reform of the Seanad. I do not know a single Member of this Seanad or the previous one who does advocate reform or believe it is long overdue. However, can I impress upon the Leader the need for an urgent debate on the economy to consider how the House might assist in creating a renewed and revitalised social partnership? The future of the nation is more important than any other consideration at this time.

Will the Leader indicate when time will be available to consider the report that I tabled before each Senator on the prevention of the repossession of family homes? He indicated that we would be able to discuss it and make recommendations.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.