Seanad debates

Thursday, 2 July 2009

Photo of Conor LenihanConor Lenihan (Dublin South West, Fianna Fail)

On behalf of the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, I thank Senator Regan for raising this matter. I assure the Senator that the provisions of section 258 of the Children Act 2001 are taken fully into account by the Garda authorities in the vetting process as a matter of routine.

Section 258 of the Children Act 2001 provides for the non-disclosure of certain findings of guilt in respect of a person if the offence in question was committed before the person attained the age of 18 years; the offence is not one required to be tried by the Central Criminal Court; a period of not less than three years has elapsed since the finding of guilt; and the person has not been dealt with for an offence in that three year period. Where all these conditions apply, a person shall be treated for all purposes in law as a person who has not committed or been charged with or prosecuted for or found guilty of or dealt with for that offence. This includes where, as part of the criminal history vetting process prior to working with children and vulnerable adults, the person is requested to provide details of his or her criminal record on a vetting application form to be processed by the Garda central vetting unit, GCVU, as well as to any subsequent disclosure by the GCVU.

The GCVU works very closely with a large number of organisations which are registered for the purposes of providing criminal history vetting related to employment. As part of the engagement with the registered organisations, the GCVU provides targeted training and ongoing information and support to the organisations concerned on the wide range of matters related to the vetting process. This training specifically covers the provisions of section 258 of the Children Act 2001 and includes disregarding any information that might be provided to which section 258 applies. This allows the authorised signatory for each organisation to deal with each individual applicant in an informed way on these important vetting issues.

It should be recalled that the primary onus in terms of the employment of any individual person rests with the employer who must take into account the range of factors relevant to an applicant, including any information that may be provided in the vetting process.

Criminal history vetting, as I have indicated, is carried out by the GCVU for registered organisations in respect of persons who may be employed or engaged in circumstances where they would have substantial unsupervised access to children or vulnerable adults. This targeted vetting service has been successfully expanded on a phased basis in recent years to the point where the 78 staff members of the vetting unit processed in excess of 218,000 vetting applications last year and the turn-around time for processing has been reduced to an average of four to five weeks. This is a remarkable achievement and the gardaĆ­ are to be commended on it.

The Garda authorities, in conjunction with the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform and in consultation with many other stakeholders through the implementation group on Garda vetting, keep vetting processes and procedures under constant review to ensure that best practice is applied. The implementation group also allows for important interaction with the registered organisations in ensuring that the vetting process meets their needs as well as enhancing the safety of children and vulnerable adults.

This review process includes the content of the Garda vetting form which is being updated and redesigned. That process has taken fully into account the Children Act provisions which have been referred to and this will be reflected explicitly in the final version of the form. It will also seek to include any elements that may be necessary arising from the vetting legislation currently being prepared by the Department of Health and Children.

I thank the Senator for raising this point about the form. If he has encountered detail in regard to this I suggest he communicate directly with the Minister, Deputy Dermot Ahern, to ensure that if there is a glitch or an inadvertent problem in the area it can be resolved.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.