David Norris (Independent)

My point is absolutely on the amendment. It is a pre-emptive strike to save a little time. I anticipate what the Minister of State may say in part of her response, especially on the plea many of us have made for the inclusion of social workers as a category. It is quite astonishing that they should be left out in light of everything that has been said by Senator Fitzgerald who has professional experience in this area. For that reason alone we should listen to her argument.

Having read the record, I note Deputy Paul Connaughton of Fine Gael made a very strong argument for the inclusion of social workers because there are isolated elderly males in rural circumstances. He stated their social background should be assessed in addition to the other criteria. It is very ironic today that the rural night-time bus service is to be cancelled for economic reasons, bearing in mind that it was introduced after a very powerful intervention by the President of Ireland, Ms Mary McAleese, and her husband, Mr. Martin McAleese. It is now possible that it will be withdrawn and it is important to bear this in mind.

I understand that in the discussions in the Dáil, amendments were tabled to the legislation. Amendment No. 114 - I am not sure whether it was tabled by the Government or Fine Gael - concerned the addition of social workers to the list of specified persons in the Bill. If the Minister of State is going to pop that one out at us, so to speak, and suggest it addresses the matter, it will not be acceptable. The provision was incorporated into the text of the Bill as received from the Dáil but its effect is to include social workers as a category of persons able "to apply" for assessments. The word "apply" is used but the wording does not include social workers among those persons involved in the making of assessments. That answer would not be regarded by me or Senator Fitzgerald as satisfactory. I am signalling that point, which is my shot across the bows.