Barry Andrews (Dún Laoghaire, Fianna Fail)

I am inclined to accept the principle behind the amendments in regard to the words "refuses to" because we can do something on that and it is probably worthwhile to do so. The only caveat and reason I would not accept the amendments today is that I am concerned there may be an unintended consequence that mothers may be less inclined to reveal the identity of fathers. There is a possibility that they may opt instead not to do that more easily. As Members are aware, we are trying to guide ourselves on the principle of what is in the best interests of a child. It is obviously in the best interests of a child for many reasons that we would know the identity of the father. If Senator Bacik would withdraw her amendments, we might return to this issue.

However, in regard to the use of the word "co-operation" in amendments Nos. 9 and 11, I am not minded to accept that "co-operation" is a pejorative term and the section is improved by the substitution for it of the word "assistance". Co-operation has always been positive. While I accept it is an issue of language, I am satisfied that the co-operation of the mother is understood to be in the best interests of the child in those circumstances.