David Norris (Independent)

I support this amendment. It is a deficiency in the Bill that there is insufficient recognition of the significant problem of homelessness. I know it is the Minister of State's intention to deal with this, as he has clearly indicated. He has ambitious plans and we believe him, but in this section we have the matter of segregation between persons of different social backgrounds, as well as mixed dwelling types. Other categories are clearly specified, yet there is no mention of the homeless who are glaringly absent. Senator Coffey's amendment is very reasonable and I hope the Minister of State will be able to take it on board. Even if the Minister of State regards it as redundant to a certain degree, it does not conflict with the intention of the Bill or with his stated views in the House, as far as I understand them. If the Minister of State accepted the amendment, it would be an indication that it is worth our while arguing here because to date not one Opposition amendment has been accepted. I am watching with great interest to see if any Opposition amendments will be accepted whose constitutional remit is to amend and revise legislation in the best interests of the people.