Seanad debates

Tuesday, 11 March 2008

Defamation Bill 2006: Report and Final Stages

 

7:00 pm

Photo of Alex WhiteAlex White (Labour)

Freedom of the press is a very important element of any democracy. This legislation has been vitally important to that debate and in securing a robust regime — if I can use that word — of freedom of expression in this jurisdiction. We know it also has an important constitutional underpinning. We have better tuned the balance that needs to be provided for as to a person's good name and the important right of freedom of expression. The debate has been important in that regard.

There are many journalists, editors and, no doubt, newspaper and other media proprietors who do a very important and professional job. Much of what is published and broadcast offends people and much of it is offensive and in some cases reprehensible. However, we must uphold the right to freedom of expression given the important safeguards we have in our legislation and the restrictions that exist. These changes have not been brought about at the behest of any element of our society, whether newspaper editors, media barons or otherwise. The question of determining where the public interest lies is a matter for the Parliament of any country and not for any particular special interest, whether they be the owners of newspapers, broadcasters or anybody else. That is the basis on which I have approached this debate.

I commend the Minister on his willingness to listen carefully to what has been said on both sides of the House — even though our side has not always been in full agreement with itself. That has also contributed to the debate which has been intelligent and stimulating. The legislation going to the Lower House is much improved for that reason.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.