Seanad debates

Wednesday, 27 February 2008

6:00 pm

Photo of Labhrás Ó MurchúLabhrás Ó Murchú (Fianna Fail)

In a way that diminishes the argument we are trying to make on behalf of same sex couples. It is not an issue of knowing what is happening in the bedroom. It is an issue of affection and of sharing lives together. If we are to go down that road, the issue of siblings needs to be brought to bear. I do not know at what age that should start or whatever the case might be. However, we must have a discussion on the matter.

I am glad the Government's amendment is not the usual type. It is a chronological list of what has been done to date, which was appropriate to do. Senator Norris would rightly get credit for some of those developments. It is important to provide the background from whence we have come to where we are, which the amendment does. Having listened to what the Minister said, as I understand it, we are talking about civil partnerships. The issues and headings he outlined are comprehensive and all embracing. Ultimately one wonders why it is necessary even to take on the bastion of the traditional family status in this case because it will create division and a negative reaction, which nobody wants in this case.

I compliment Senator Norris on having tabled the motion. There is too much talk in the back rooms and corridors. Let us come in and express our views and let us not be insulting to anyone in this. Let us learn from each other, as that is what debate should be about. There is a considerable amount in the amendment when it is taken in light of the Minister's measured contribution and the Taoiseach's statement in 2006. We have much there on which to build.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.