Seanad debates
Tuesday, 19 February 2008
Order of Business
3:00 pm
Eoghan Harris (Independent)
I accept that. However it came about or however it may be reformed in the future, the Seanad is likely to be a permanent part of the institutions of the State, not least because it would require approximately 50 amendments of the Constitution to remove it. In the meantime, I suggest we go about our business. The populist sneer is that we are a talking shop. What else would we be in a democracy? We can hardly engage in armed struggle, can we? Our business is to be a talking shop and the talk here is good. I learn something every day in here, as does the public. Every discussion I have heard here, be it on the Constitution, health or road safety has illuminated Bills, cast light on dark corners and done good for the State. It is a talking shop and let us be proud of it.
No comments