Seanad debates

Wednesday, 5 December 2007

Budget Statement 2008: Statements

 

2:00 pm

Photo of David NorrisDavid Norris (Independent)

I thank my colleague and friend, Senator Feargal Quinn, for allowing me time. I greatly enjoyed his schoolmasterly performance. I am sure the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance, Deputy Brian Cowen, will be greatly heartened to know he has received a better report than in previous years. I also agree with Senator Quinn that the atmosphere in the Dáil was a little dull. The Budget Statement did not seem to provoke anything like the outrage seen in previous years. There was a certain lack of atmosphere. With regard to the general content, despite the fact that it is dull, the balance has been got right. It seems the Government is now waking up to the fact that there has been considerable squandering of public money and a notable lack of accountability, particularly in capital projects such as roads. A lot of money has been wasted. However, I will not waste time, which is another precious resource, by listing the areas in which there was a lack of prudent management, good governance and oversight. We will revisit this area in the new year, as we traditionally do.

I have a sheaf of submissions made to all Senators from the Society of St. Vincent de Paul, the Disability Federation of Ireland and so on. I am glad there was some degree of concern shown in this area. Yesterday I was speaking at the graduation ceremony of Enable Ireland at the Microsoft plant, in which sophisticated machinery is produced which allows people who are disabled to re-enter the workplace, where they can play a significant economic role. This is a useful investment, because it costs many tens of thousands of euros, for example, to retire somebody owing to disability. For 80% of people with disabilities, theirs is an acquired disability such as spinal injury. That is very interesting. Almost 70% of those with disabilities remain unemployed. That is a huge figure compared with the equivalent in continental countries. Anything that allows people with disabilities to be productive members of society is to be welcomed.

I was sitting in the Gallery for the Budget Statement. I noted that there was general allocation of €2.7 billion for rail and bus services. There was no mention whatever of the metro, however, although the Luas was mentioned. I hope this is not a sinister prelude to a dilution of the metro programme. It is probably the most vital element of transport for this capital city and it affects everybody in the country because such a disproportionate number of people live here. I hope there will be a continued and firm commitment to this sensible development.

The environmental tax and VRT provisions are fine. However, the raising of motor tax for larger capacity vehicles is just grubbing around for a few extra pence. It has nothing whatever to do with the environment. The Minister may nod his head all he likes, but he will still be wrong. He is nodding again, but I will remove the nod. The only way to implement the polluter pays principle is to put a tax on petrol. I have a large car. It is a beautiful car which I bought for €5,000. I keep it in the garage and walk here almost every day. I used to cycle until it became too dangerous. How much pollution am I creating? A person in a Mini creates a lot more if he or she uses it all the time. A tax on petrol would affect the environment, but tax on large cars will not. This will affect poorer people.

The doubling of duty on cheques is a stingy measure. The Minister said he wants to use this to drive people to use automated systems and credit cards. However, elderly people and people who are a little bit thick, like me, use cheques. They do not want to use automated systems because they do not understand them.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.