Feargal Quinn (Independent)

I have a comment. Section 12(2)(f) states:

a person who—

(i) has at least 7 years' practical experience of performing duties commensurate with those of an architect in the State,

(ii) is at least 35 years of age[.]

Why is there a minimum age of 35? I believe the minimum age stipulation still exists for presidents in America, but I cannot remember what it is for our president. It may be 35 years of age as well. I would question this stipulation in the Bill.

The Minister's actions in arranging for somebody to be able to practise on this basis are very worthy in that people must have at least seven years' practical experience of performing duties commensurate with those of an architect in the State and have passed a prescribed register admission examination. Why would we need the age stipulation in that case?