Seanad debates

Wednesday, 7 March 2007

Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) (Amendment) Bill 2007: Second Stage

 

12:00 pm

Photo of Mary O'RourkeMary O'Rourke (Fianna Fail)

I was pleased with my decision on how I would conduct myself during the divorce referendum campaign. At that time my 18 year old son was entitled to vote for the first time. I did not comment when he told me he was leaving for the polling station and he cycled off and cast his vote. On his return he told me he had cast his first vote in favour of divorce. When he said I had not tried to influence him I told him he was a grown adult and could make up his own mind.

It is interesting that attempts are made to put people in boxes or pin labels on them if they dare mention a certain word. I remember during the abortion referenda that one would be labelled an abortionist for speaking in a certain manner. I note from recent large advertisements in the Irish Examiner and another newspaper that a new campaign to grill politicians on stem cell research is beginning. It appears that when candidates for election call at constituents' doors we will be put right by being asked certain questions. While I am in favour of candidates being asked questions on any issue, we should be allowed an opportunity to engage in intelligent discourse without being labelled for daring to have a conversation.

I welcome the Bill. The Minister was correct to move swiftly to stop panic, although I believe the matter being addressed would be encompassed by other legislation. He acted with commendable speed. While I accept Senator Quinn's point that the Seanad is supposed to be a scrutinising Chamber, all Senators who wish to speak to the Bill will be able to do so. I hope the passage of the legislation will result in more comfort and security for adults and children.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.