Seanad debates

Tuesday, 6 February 2007

2:30 pm

Photo of Ulick BurkeUlick Burke (Fine Gael)

In 2002 the Government in its programme for Government declared that no child under nine years of age would be in a class of more than 20 pupils yet, tragically, 25% of children are in classes of 30 plus. Some 50% of children are in classes of 20 to 29 children and 85% of children in national schools are in classes with pupil numbers greater than they were in 2002. The Minister declared that she has revolutionised education. All the measures she has taken have cost nothing. This is one proposal which would have cost money and the Minister has failed to deliver. As with Senator Leyden a few moments ago, I am sure Members will hear promises again as to what will be done in the near future. However, in this instance this constitutes failure.

A survey of 220 schools last November indicated clearly that despite the small increase in capitation grants, half of the schools in question are obliged to raise 50% of their running costs. At present, we have cut price education and in many primary schools, parents and teachers are obliged to make substantial fundraising efforts to provide for the bare running costs. The Minister for Education and Science should come before the House to indicate clearly whether she has a plan to reduce the pupil-teacher ratio in primary schools and what action she has taken this regard. Members have learned of the welcome appointment of special education teachers. However, classes have become larger and the students in such classes who need special education attention do not receive it. This is the problem and the Leader should ask the Minister to come before the House as a matter of urgency to indicate her plans for the future.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.