Seanad debates

Wednesday, 18 October 2006

6:00 pm

Photo of Batt O'KeeffeBatt O'Keeffe (Cork South Central, Fianna Fail)

I am pleased to have the opportunity to take this matter on behalf of my Departmental colleague, Deputy Noel Ahern.

Glenma housing estate is a private estate of 43 houses built by the NBA in 1973. Of these, 35 are privately owned; they were sold as private purchases when the estate was originally built. Limerick County Council owns and rents the remaining eight houses.

The houses were constructed with flat roofs. The first floor is finished with a metal cladding fixed to a timber stud wall which forms the internal frame of the houses. There are various defects with the houses and these include leaking roofs and poor quality external cladding which is, in general, no longer weatherproof. Limerick County Council submitted a proposal to my Department to refurbish the estate under the improvement works in lieu of housing scheme and the remedial works scheme. The proposed works include the provision of new pitched roofs to replace existing flat roofs, the recladding of external walls and the upgrading of windows, external doors and external finishes, rewiring and installation of central heating, and some site development works.

The improvement works programme allows local authorities to improve or extend privately owned accommodation occupied by households who are assessed to be eligible for local authority housing as an alternative to being rehoused by the local authority. While this scheme would not be normally used to upgrade an entire estate, this is considered to be an exceptional case and my Department agreed in principle on 14 May 2002 to have the improvement works carried out under it. Under this scheme the householders will be required to make repayments for the cost of the works to the local authority, based on the ability of households to pay. The scheme also provides that a local authority and the private resident must enter a legal agreement which will go as far as possible in protecting the expenditure of public funds on private property.

I understand extensive discussions have been held between the county council and the local residents and that 23 of the households in private ownership are fully supportive of the council's plans for refurbishment in the manner proposed. I also understand that, at this time, the remaining nine residents are not interested in having refurbishment work carried out on their homes. The plans as they now stand are for works to 23 private residences and eight local authority owned residences. The remaining 12 houses are situated in one block and all are privately owned. I understand three of these houses are unoccupied and that the council would consider purchasing the units should the remaining nine householders agree to participate in the scheme. My Department issued approval to the council on 20 July 2004 to progress the refurbishment works to the eight council owned houses under the remedial works scheme. The cost of the works was determined at €818,464.

My Department also issued approval on 20 July 2004 to the external and internal works proposed under the improvements in lieu scheme for the 23 privately owned dwellings, and a budget cost of €1,837,386 was determined for these works. It is understood delays have occurred due to agreements being obtained on the deed of charge whereby the cost of the works to private houses are charged against the folio. This enables the council to recoup the cost of the works in the event of the property being sold on. However, the council has obtained agreements in respect of one entire block which comprises six units — three private and three local authority owned. It is anticipated work will commence in early November on this block, subject to agreement with the contractor. It is understood from the council that discussions are ongoing in respect of the deed of charge for the remaining units.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.