Joanna Tuffy (Labour)

Yes. This model differs from the European Parliament model, which is concerned with airing one's grievances. It also differs from the e-consultation that was carried out in respect of the Broadcasting Bill, although that was welcome. The right to petition goes much further. There is real dialogue and the public has a significant instigative role, which is extremely important.

This proposal would be ideal for the Seanad because its mandate is different from that of the Dáil. Members are not elected to particular constituencies and can take a broader view. Petitions would not be approached in a narrow fashion, while a Deputy might be placed under pressure on a particular issue. Members can take a broad view and this House has a record for so doing in the past. It has a record of being a less adversarial model. Members go through the nitty-gritty of legislation and this could be also done with petitions once they reached the House.

Moreover, there has been much debate regarding Seanad reform. Senator O'Rourke has taken the debate on this issue much further than anyone else. I have researched the issue and it has arisen many times. Although many Leaders have facilitated debates and statements on Seanad reform, Senator O'Rourke is the only person who held proper public consultation on the issue, which resulted in a substantial report.