Seanad debates

Wednesday, 31 May 2006

10:30 am

Photo of Jim WalshJim Walsh (Fianna Fail)

I fully concur with almost everything Senator Norris said about this matter, which involves some complex legal issues. There is no monopoly of concern on either side of the House. We are concerned because a loophole has been opened and needs to be closed as quickly and effectively as possible. It is important that we have a debate on it. It is equally important, given the complexity of the issue, that a member of the Cabinet should be present for the debate. I would like to think we could put party politics aside, speak with one voice and give some leadership on this issue. While there is widespread public concern about recent developments, we do not need to follow some of the alarmist and knee-jerk comments which have been made. This House often examines issue of public concern in a constructive manner and I would like to think we can do so in this case. I join those who have asked the Acting Leader to endeavour to have a debate on this subject at some stage today, if at all possible. I hope the legislation which is now necessary to deal with this problem can be brought to the House as soon as possible.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.