Feargal Quinn (Independent)

The Minister of State listened to the argument made by Senators McDowell and O'Toole for acceptance of their amendment. I do not have a problem with question of paid time off. While that would not have been readily accepted by employers a generation or two ago, it is recognised as being necessary now if this system is to work.

I have a problem with the version of amendment No. 35, but it has been well covered by the Minister of State's wording in Schedule 3. I understand the gist of what the Minister of State is attempting to do. The balance struck takes account of the point — if not wholeheartedly and 100% but sufficiently to recognise the need for it — made by Senator McDowell on Committee Stage. The version the Minister of State inserted in Schedule 3 covers the areas concerned and is probably more efficiently covered than would otherwise be the case.