Seanad debates

Tuesday, 11 October 2005

3:00 pm

Photo of David NorrisDavid Norris (Independent)

I am also seeking a debate on the rolling scandal involving computer technology in various Departments. I was speaking at a dinner last night. One of our really excellent entrepreneurs and businessmen who operates in this area discussed the matter with me. I was left wondering why we did not have a trade mission to this country to sell our own computer expertise. Why do we go to big foreign conglomerates? We have a reputation for being at the front end of research and design in this area, along with numerous other small countries. Why do we not source this type of material here? They would be far less likely to make a bags of it. Big companies, on the other hand, are responsible for damage to a major pharmaceutical concern in the US. They have done the same to the British health service. Then they come to us. A local company, however, would be afraid to move from an estimate of €9 million to one of €400 million. Will the Leader request from the various Departments figures on how much of our information technology is domestically generated?

Senators will take the next issue I raise to their hearts. I listened to people discuss the Residential Institutions Redress Board on radio this morning. It is important the Leader arrange for a debate to take place once the board has reported because many people believe its remit should have been extended. Despite a Government commitment to pay the legal expenses of all those involved, solicitors are taking €15,000 or €20,000 from compensation payments before they are passed on to people who have already been damaged by the institutions of the State. This is a scandal. The House should review the issue when the Residential Institutions Redress Board concludes its work.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.