Seanad debates

Wednesday, 29 June 2005

Interpretation Bill 2000: Committee Stage.

 

2:00 am

Photo of Brendan RyanBrendan Ryan (Labour)

I probably should not have spent as much time this morning reading this Bill as I did. I have a problem with regard to the word "absurd" in section 3(2)(b)(ii) in the phrase "the other enactment would be changed in intent or become unclear or absurd". I have no problem with "changed in intent" or "become unclear", but "absurd" is an extraordinarily subjective word. I am not trying to be awkward about this. Wearing my left of centre ideological hat, half the economists in Ireland think my position on many issues is absurd.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.