Seanad debates

Thursday, 2 June 2005

10:30 am

Photo of David NorrisDavid Norris (Independent)

I thank the Cathaoirleach for confirming my opinion that there is no need for balance on the Order of Business. It had struck me.

The matter raised by the Leader is serious but it would not be appropriate to name and shame, to use a favourite phrase. The matter is serious because a dereliction of responsibility is involved if people kick up a fuss and call for debates but are charged with attending committees when those debates are due to be held. Sometimes there are conflicts regarding scheduling. There is a lack — I will put it no stronger than that — if they do not report to this House, resulting in the cancellation of the debate. It is regrettable and the leaders of the relevant Members' groups should talk to them about it.

We are all in the debt of Mr. Justice Frederick Morris because of the efficiency and clarity of his report, which begs many questions. Apparently people who lied to the tribunal will be allowed to remain in their posts, as is the case at present. The first Morris report made recommendations, which have been repeated in the second report, but none of them has been acted upon. We need to have them acted upon speedily. I support the call for a debate on this matter.

It seems the system failed to vindicate the rights of the McBrearty family, who were framed. They had to attend the tribunal and seek legal representation. At a late stage, they had great difficulty in obtaining financial support. There is an urgent need for a debate on this matter.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.