Seanad debates

Wednesday, 16 February 2005

11:00 am

Photo of Mary O'RourkeMary O'Rourke (Fianna Fail)

I would welcome the Bill being debated for two hours tonight because the views expressed by speakers from all sides would be very interesting and would add texture to the ongoing debate on this important issue. The Houses of the Oireachtas should seek precedence and be the prime movers on matters such as this and the courts, including European courts, should not impose their will. Surely Members are able to make up their minds on the issue.

Rather than being delighted to defer the debate, I had been looking forward to speaking to the Bill and, like many other Senators, had indicated to the Government Chief Whip that I wished to do so. My colleagues and I look forward to placing our views on record for everybody to see. It would be wrong to claim that everybody has the same view. How could that be the case? Our diverse lives bear witness to the different points of view that would have emerged this evening. My comments are addressed to Senators Brian Hayes, Norris and O'Meara.

Senator Brian Hayes referred to the point of view expressed by the Minister of State at the Department of Transport, Deputy Callely. The Minister of State is an excellent, positive Minister who has come before the House on several occasions and works hard at his job. The Senator will shortly be able to address him directly when he comes before the House.

Senator O'Meara called for a debate on amending the Standards in Public Office Act. She also raised global warming.

Senator Dardis stated that much greater progress would have been made in reducing consumption of fossil fuels if China, the United States and India had been involved in the Kyoto Protocol.

Senator Coghlan agreed with Senator Brian Hayes. He also expressed concern about Dinis Cottage near the Meetings of the Waters and asked that we intervene with the heritage council.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.