Joe O'Toole (Independent)

I understand the points the Minister of State has made and can see from where they are coming. I also recognise the improvements in the Bill in regard to the flexibility on the six and 14 weeks. However, the issue is about flexibility. A couple who have just had a baby face costs for cots and prams as well as childminding and crèche facilities, all of which must still be paid during a period of parental leave since crèche places must be maintained. If parents could take leave in smaller sections, they would not have to do without income for such a long period. That is the only issue.

Nonetheless, I can see the arguments as to how that might not work in certain employments. For this reason, the amendment provides that it is possible where it is acceptable to the employer. All that is involved is more flexibility on an agreed basis at local workplace level with no cost. Will the Minister of State reconsider accepting the amendment on Report Stage? I will not push the amendment to a vote. If it does not suit all sides it would be wrong to force it, but I am trying to reach a position at which a certain provision would suit all sides. For example, an employee could take a shorter period of time with his or her child spread over a number of periods.