Seanad debates

Tuesday, 8 February 2005

2:30 pm

Photo of Joe O'TooleJoe O'Toole (Independent)

I do not take the views of Kevin Myers in The Irish Times to be important. However, many others do. His judgment has been flawed so many times that thinking people cannot take him seriously. Unfortunately, his views are communicated to a much wider group than those who would analyse them. His fascistic rantings in today's column crossed over the line of incitement to hatred. He chose to have a go at and pointed out a vulnerable and dependent group in society. While he is entitled to have a go at the group, he is also required to keep within the bounds of civilised discussion and the laws of the land. Does the Leader believe that Mr. Myers has crossed the line in an incitement to hatred and that it should be investigated?

This has happened in societies throughout the ages and what is of concern is that it can quickly grow legs. Using terms such as "bastards", which have a proper dictionary definition and legal interpretation, is no excuse for the fact that it is offensive language in certain times and places. It is not acceptable. Considering his judgment in the past, I do not find the term hurtful or offensive. However, it exposed a harmless and dependent group in society to all sorts of mad people. Giving oxygen to fanatics who will take it as an opportunity to further victimise these people is utterly unacceptable. I am sure the Leader agrees with some, if not all, of my views on this. I believe it should be reported and investigated. We do not need this in society. He is entitled to his views, he can vote, be elected and argue against the social welfare supports of various groups in society. He is entitled to do so, but that is about it. The House must give a view on this matter. This is not a liberal, sensitive or lefty issue. Members on all sides of the House will share my views on the unacceptability of the offensive ranting in today's column in The Irish Times.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.