Seanad debates

Wednesday, 14 July 2004

State Airports Bill 2004: Committee Stage.

 

11:00 am

Photo of Séamus BrennanSéamus Brennan (Dublin South, Fianna Fail)

I agree with Senator Browne's analysis. The purpose of the proposed subsection (3) is to statutorily underpin two companies as permanent State companies. However, Government needs flexibility in dealing with such issues and I do not consider it wise to put it into legislation. It is preferable to retain the flexibility that currently exists. Important business issues surround both of these companies and their locations.

I accept what Senator McDowell is aiming to do in his proposed subsection (2). I do not have a problem with the concept but it is not necessary because the legislation makes it clear that the three airports will remain in State ownership. Effectively, we are doing what is required by the Senator in subsection (2). Subsection (3) would cause me difficulties for the reasons outlined; namely that it does not give any flexibility to Government in this area.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.