Seanad debates

Thursday, 1 July 2004

National Monuments (Amendment) Bill 2004: Second Stage.

 

3:00 pm

Photo of Michael McCarthyMichael McCarthy (Labour)

This gave a huge sense of false hope to those vehemently opposed to the project. However, it shows how the various organs of the State can be used to suit different opinions in what is a long-running dispute. There have been many debates in the House on proper planning and the role of outside bodies, and we have complained about various outside interest groups. Irrespective of the extent of the disagreements, we recognise that in the pursuit of proper planning, taking due cognisance of the institutions of the State, we must balance the preservation of heritage and the short-term needs of the people, motorists in this instance.

My party will oppose the Bill on all Stages. We regret that the Minister is giving himself too much power. Given that we debated the Water Services Bill in the House today, other issues arise in regard to the decision making ability of officials and elected members and the extent of the abuse of power. This is one case where too much power goes to the Minister of the day and this will not serve the interests of the State. I accept that the Bill will pass despite the many fine words against it. However, in due course, when we realise the extent of fines in other areas, we will understand the huge discretion accorded to the Minister under the Bill. It is regrettable and I will oppose the Bill vehemently. I appeal to the Minister to give due cognisance to heritage, of which the nation is very proud.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.