James Bannon (Fine Gael)

As a result, 43 of the 60 seats were filled from vocational panels, a position we now propose to change, bringing us nearer to the original concept of 1922.

Change is important for growth and the Seanad is not immune to the need for such change. However, it could be said that for any meaningful change to take place, Seanad reform should follow what many see as necessary change in the Dáil. It is important that any Seanad changes should reflect the input of all sectors of this House and all strands of the wider community.

It is desirable that members of the public were involved in the process of Seanad reform and were invited to give their views. There is a contradiction between the Leader of the House and the leader of the Progressive Democrats group on that matter. Senator Dardis is correct that there were 161 submissions which gave us a view of public opinion on Seanad reform.

Direct Seanad elections are probably the most important change to encourage and strengthen public interest in the workings of the House and give purpose to public perception of its viability. At one time, the Progressive Democrats had a policy to abolish this House but I am glad they had a change of heart on the issue.