John Dardis (Progressive Democrats)

I note the report states that in the absence of reform, that might be considered. The Seanad performs a valuable role. It would not surprise anybody that because I am a Member I am not particularly in favour of abolition, and have not been for some considerable time. I do not see an inconsistency with having an abolitionist attitude and participating. The Seanad is a very important political institution and a political party has to participate in the political institutions of the State. I have this speech rehearsed and off by heart after 14 years. We have a duty to participate, but that does not mean we did not raise radical views with the committee.

It would be good for democracy for a major proportion of Senators to be elected by direct franchise as it would give people a sense of ownership of the work of the Seanad. It is important that the Unionist and Nationalist tradition as well as emigrants and other under-represented groups are reflected in the Taoiseach's nominees. I agree that the Cathaoirleach should be returned automatically as is standard practice in most parliaments where the speaker is returned unopposed. I would also like former Taoisigh and Tánaistí to have the right to be Members, if they were to choose to exercise that option although I appreciate the constitutional difficulties involved.

The Seanad could have a more meaningful role in debating the issues that will arise in Europe and in considering legislation at the early stage when the possibility for consultation exists and in reviewing policy. I agree that the Leader, and I know she excluded herself from this, should be able to attend Cabinet meetings.