Seanad debates

Wednesday, 26 May 2004

Adoptive Leave Bill 2004: Committee Stage.

 

1:00 pm

Photo of Jim WalshJim Walsh (Fianna Fail)

While the amendment might appear plausible, the Bill is a fairly significant step forward for adoptive parents. It will bring them into line with natural parents in this area, which is a good initiative. However, we must also be mindful of maintaining a balance. It is an imposition on employers, particularly on small employers, which must be recognised. Building into the legislation such a proposal could give rise to difficulties. There is a difference between an adoptive parent and the natural parent who bears the child. When it comes close to the birth of a child, it is probably prudent that parents should be able to take leave. The same does not apply in the case of adoptive parents. While I am aware that people travel abroad and so on, I am not sure it would be wise to move in this direction.

The Bill is a major step forward but we must be mindful of the balance that must be maintained. We have embraced much of the social legislation coming from Europe, which imposes responsibilities on employers. It must be recognised that there are other states and economies within Europe who have secured derogations and have not embraced these social changes to the same extent. We must be mindful that everyone, including adoptive parents, should be treated fairly. I am not sure the argument is sufficiently strong to make the change sought.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.