Martin Mansergh (Fianna Fail)

I do not see any particular necessity for this provision. There is a danger in this House, and in the profession to which we all belong, that we pussyfoot around issues and make sure that we do not tread on any toes and so on. I was subject to the most intense lobbying by way of letters and other communications, seeking my views on this Bill in order that their authors could inform my constituents. People might like to say this is purely altruistic-type advocacy or lobbying, or one could take the view that there are interests involved. The core objective of this Bill is to take some of the insurance cases out of the courts along with the associated legal costs. I am perfectly within my rights in commenting on certain amendments which appear to me to be going contrary to that intention and indeed towards ensuring that practically everything stays with the courts and does not go to the PIAB. I make no apologies for opposing amendments with that purpose, whether this is intended. I value the input of the legal profession to our society and I have many friends in the profession. I am quite certain there will be more than enough business for them without the business directed to the PIAB and that they can continue to earn a very good living.