Seanad debates
Monday, 24 November 2003
Personal Injuries Assessment Board Bill 2003: Committee Stage.
1:45 pm
Paul Bradford (Fine Gael)
I move amendment No. 29:
In page 29, subsection (2), line 23, to delete "9" and substitute "6".
I was interested in what the Tánaiste said about the last amendment. She expressed her desire that at some stage up to 95% of claims could end up being dealt with through the board, which would be a marvellous achievement for the Tánaiste. If we are to move in that direction we must ensure that the target dates are such that they will provide an incentive to claimants and insurers to use this facility. I concede that a target date of nine months is reasonable, but as we set out on this new road we must try to be more daring.
A six month timeframe would be advantageous from two points of view. It would clearly show insurers and claimants that we are serious about making this board work effectively, efficiently and transparently and making it the normal route for the majority of claims. It would also put an onus on the Department and on the State to ensure the board has the resources and staff to make the system work. All our targets and aspirations will come to naught unless this happens. The board will need significant resources to ensure its work is done properly. If we provide for a six month timeframe, it puts pressure on everybody to deliver. As we develop this new approach, we should set the bar high. A six month timeframe would be a positive step in this direction.
No comments