When the Minister of State mentions 14 visits a year to identify sea lice I am not sure what sanctions are imposed if the Department finds that sea lice are present in excessive quantities. This argument has raged for many years in relation to sea trout, particularly during migration in estuaries, usually between January and May. That is a critical time for the survival of this species, including the effects of sea lice. In such a situation the Department should invoke whatever sanctions are required. It is good husbandry practice to ensure proper treatment for sea lice infestation. I would be concerned with short cuts being taken for economic reasons. I am not saying that is happening but it could arise.