David Norris (Independent)

Perhaps there is justification for transferring responsibility for speed cameras to a commercial authority. That would create considerable resentment, however, and, before it is done, realistic speed limits must be introduced.

With regard to accidents in urban areas, we have a duty to educate pedestrians and cyclists. We are all pedestrians and many of us are cyclists, as well as being motorists. I am horrified by people who sail around the roads – not just in the cities, where the streets are well lit, but also in rural areas – with no lights on their bicycles and wear dark clothing, which makes them difficult to see. No amount of tinkering with the speed limit is going to save the lives of such foolish people.

I will ignore the first half of the amendment because it is politically destructive and merely attacks the Government. However, the Minister was courageous to state that he agrees with some of the issues raised. It is a good idea, and a reasonable proposal, to establish the statutory registration for driving instructors. These people are charged with controlling the quality of driving which has a real impact on road fatalities. However, we do not register or test them and, as a result, anybody can set up operations as a driving instructor. That is not correct.

I accept that the issue of competition in the motor insurance sector falls slightly outside of the debate, or it was until Fine Gael included it in its amendment. The Minister, more power to him, took up the point. I am glad to hear about the way he has been speaking to the insurance companies, because that is what they need.

I am again being parochial and personal, but I represent many people who do not understand why they are expected to pay so much for their insurance. I have a no claims bonus which dates back centuries. I obtained my driving licence when I was 16.