Seanad debates

Thursday, 6 March 2003

Local Government Bill 2003: Committee Stage.

 

10:30 am

Photo of Martin CullenMartin Cullen (Waterford, Fianna Fail)

I understand the logic behind the amendment which would insert a new subsection (5) in section 3 of the Bill, as published. It seeks to have local authority annual reports laid before both Houses. I have already indicated my intention to bring forward a new version of section 3 by way of amendment on Report Stage which will provide for the making of regulations. I propose to deal with the matter of annual accounts in this way. I hope to deal with it more effectively rather than just accept this proposal. There should be a clear direction through the regulations that Deputies must be furnished directly with a copy of annual reports.

I agree with Senator Ryan about the timeframe. We have had this discussion at Government level a number of times recently. It is impossible for us to have debate on a topical issue if the only information available from the organisation concerned is three years out of date. The whole organisation could have changed and we would have no way of knowing this. The debate would be held in a vacuum without the real facts. I am determined that all reports will have to be produced within a matter of months of the year's closure in order that we can deal properly with matters. The thought has struck me in regard to the time frame that it is a matter for local authority members to direct their managers and set their own rules. I do not want to be caught dictating matters but it should be clear that we need a time frame. I will return to this issue on Report Stage.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.