Seanad debates

Tuesday, 25 February 2003

Protection of the Environment Bill 2003: Committee Stage.

 

2:30 pm

Photo of Martin CullenMartin Cullen (Waterford, Fianna Fail)

We should not depart from the terms of the IPPC directive. I am maintaining consistency in that area. The existing text of the Bill provides a balanced approach and if significant reductions in emissions can be achieved without imposing excessive costs, the EPA should be required to initiate the review and, on foot of that, make the appropriate changes in the licence. I do not agree, however, that it is reasonable to impose a requirement on industry which would give rise to costs disproportionate to the benefits likely to accrue. That would be the effect of the Senator's proposal. Moreover, the wording in this subsection comes from Article 13 of the directive and will also apply in other member states. It is important to maintain consistency. It is preferable, therefore, that the qualification be retained. If the costs are excessive they should not be incurred.

Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.