Seanad debates

Wednesday, 29 January 2003

Immigration Bill, 2002: Committee Stage (Resumed).

 

2:30 pm

Photo of Michael McDowellMichael McDowell (Dublin South East, Progressive Democrats)

Briefly, I am opposed to this amendment. I do not think our provision is over the top. The Bill casts a legal duty upon asylum applicants to comply with the law. It is not a moral duty. I am not legislating for morality but for a crisp, firm, legal duty. This is not a desideratum, to use a Latin phrase, but a sine qua non. As far as the policy of the Act is concerned, there is a clear unequivocal legal duty. In some cases a failure to comply with it is punishable. Once the process is invoked an asylum applicant must see it through.

Amendment to amendment, by leave, withdrawn.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.