Seanad debates

Thursday, 12 December 2002

Photo of Mary O'RourkeMary O'Rourke (Fianna Fail)

As Senator Ross pointed out, the cut was made to boost sluggish economies in Europe and 0.5% is a considerable reduction. His point is well made and should be taken up immediately.

The Senator also referred to the Appropriation Bill. While it must be passed quickly for early signature because of the measures it contains, the House always has an extended debate on it following the Christmas recess.

Senator Ryan supported Senator Hayes on the Monaghan matter. He also raised the plans of the Minister for Education and Science. My understanding is the issue is, not whether teachers will be appointed, but where they will be appointed. In other words, teachers will be appointed where they are most needed and the number of appointments will not be affected. I will have the matter clarified.

Senators Ryan and Henry asked about the Criminal Law (Insanity) Bill. Senator Henry first raised the Bill with me a few months ago. She agrees with Senator Feeney's comments on the use of padded cells and her praise for the Minister's directive about their use. I met the Minister approximately six weeks ago and told him we were keen to have the Bill initiated in the Seanad. He has agreed to our request and it is scheduled for the first week of the new session.

Senator Fitzgerald correctly pointed out a review of all special needs in schools would be undertaken by the Department of Education and Science to which the Minister is committed. I do not know the reason we are afraid to debate such issues because they relate to disadvantaged young students and the more they are targeted the better. I cannot understand the reason all farmers and pupils want to be classed as disadvantaged. Surely they would like to be advantaged sometimes.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.